Italy’s parliament passes “Google tax” on digital advertisements

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2013. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Italy’s Senate, the Senato della Repubblica, passed a law on Monday under which Italian companies will be required to purchase online advertising from Italian companies, rather than from companies based in foreign countries. The law was passed by the lower house, the Camera dei Deputati, on December 20th.

However, opponents say the new measure, which some have called a “Google tax,” violates EU law, which generally allows European companies to transact business across national borders without regard to where the company is based and forbids legal discrimination amongst people based in different EU countries.

The law requires Italian companies to purchase their online advertising from companies with Italian VAT registrations, which is designed to keep these transactions within the reach of the Italian tax authorities.

Currently, advertising bought from foreign companies may avoid taxation in the country where it is purchased, and much online advertising in Europe is purchased that way. For example, most of Google’s European advertising sales are reportedly made through a subsidiary based in Ireland, which in turn pays royalties to another subsidiary based in Bermuda. As a result, the countries in which the advertising is bought realise no tax revenue on the transaction. Google’s Italian subsidiary reportedly paid just €1.8 million in tax last year.

Under the supremacy principle of EU law (Declaration 17 of the Consolidated EU Treaties), EU legislation trumps national legislation, so if the new law is found to conflict with EU law, it can be struck down. However, it is not yet known if anyone will mount a legal challenge.

Alistair M. Nevius (anevius@aicpa.org) is editor-in-chief, tax for CGMA Magazine.

Up Next

Financial modelling with AI: Part 1

Financial modelling with AI: Part 1

By Liam Bastick, FCMA, CGMA
May 23, 2025
Consider the current limitations, risks, and required checking/auditing procedures you should implement when using generative AI with financial models.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

Financial modelling with AI: Part 1

Employee respite dimmed by work pressures

IAASB issues going concern guidance for stakeholders

Building executive presence: Tips and strategies

Return to office or retain flexibility? The latest on the debate

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles

UK budget: National Insurance rate to increase for employers