G20 watchdog says bank climate stress tests may understate exposures

Many of the tests do not capture 'second round' effects, or impact on banks of climate change hitting the wider economy, the Financial Stability Board found.

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2022. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

A currency dealer works in front of electronic boards at a dealing room of a bank in Seoul, South Korea, 25 August 2015.

A currency dealer works in front of electronic boards at a dealing room of a bank in Seoul, South Korea, 25 August 2015.

Climate-related stress tests for banks need to better capture the indirect fallout of climate change on lenders and the wider global economy, the G20’s Financial Stability Board said on Tuesday.

The European Central Bank, Bank of England, and other central banks have completed an initial batch of experimental stress tests to assess how banks will cope with the impact of climate change on their business.

The results were not used to determine capital levels.

The FSB said in a joint report with the Network for Greening the Financial System, a grouping of central banks whose work shaped the initial climate test scenarios, that initial exercises were limited to the domestic impact.

“In addition … measures of exposure and vulnerability are likely understated,” the report said.

Echoing what industry officials have already said, the report said that many of the tests do not capture “second round” effects, or impact on banks of climate change hitting the wider economy.

The tests also did not fully capture potentially large sources of risk, such as those from an abrupt correction in the prices of assets on bank balance sheets.

Data gaps need plugging and more cross-border action was also needed, the report added.

“A key priority going forward will be to enhance the understanding of how first-round and second-round effects under different scenarios could give rise to financial stability concerns,” Klaas Knot, chair of the FSB and the Dutch central bank, said in a statement.

Earlier this month the European Central Bank said euro-zone lenders were still failing to meet its climate disclosure and management expectations.

The Bank of England said in July that future climate-related stress tests could focus on specific activities at banks, such as trading, which was missing from its first test.

Up Next

Financial modelling with AI: Part 1

Financial modelling with AI: Part 1

By Liam Bastick, FCMA, CGMA
May 23, 2025
Consider the current limitations, risks, and required checking/auditing procedures you should implement when using generative AI with financial models.
Advertisement

LATEST STORIES

Financial modelling with AI: Part 1

Employee respite dimmed by work pressures

IAASB issues going concern guidance for stakeholders

Building executive presence: Tips and strategies

Return to office or retain flexibility? The latest on the debate

Advertisement
Read the latest FM digital edition, exclusively for CIMA members and AICPA members who hold the CGMA designation.
Advertisement

Related Articles